|
Dateline: April 15, 2004
MCNH
finances center of debate
By
Roger Estlack, Clarendon Enterprise
The
financial condition of the Medical Center Nursing Home has become a
central issue as voters prepare to cast ballots in next month’s hospital
board election.
Board
member Alan Fletcher is raising concerns over the home’s financial
losses, the cancellation of the Donley County Hospital District’s
professional liability insurance, and the amount of debt the district has.
Fletcher
points to the district audit report for fiscal year July 1, 2002, to June
30, 2003, which shows Medical Center Nursing Home had a net loss of
$199,739, and says the home has lost more than $600,000 in the last four
years. He says part of the problem is that the budget has been prepared
based on 96 percent occupancy and that average occupancy is closer to 91
percent.
But
district administrator Alan Graham says the district’s books really look
pretty good, and he says he’s willing to discuss the matter anytime. He
doesn’t dispute Fletcher’s numbers, just the interpretation of them,
and he says the nursing home is on track to make a profit this fiscal
year.
The
$199,739 loss shown in the audit report, Graham notes, includes expenses
for more than $110,000 in depreciation and interest payments on bonds
totaling $88,696, – the latter of which should be considered a hospital
district expense rather than strictly a nursing home expense.
The
hospital district is comprised of three components – the nursing home,
the Associated Ambulance Authority, and the district itself, which has
some administrative duties and is responsible for indigent health care
payments.
Graham
said the annual audit report only has two categories – one for the
ambulance service and one entitled “Medical Center,” which includes
the nursing home and the district expenses – and that can be confusing.
Graham
also said the audit report does show a net loss for MCNH in the last
fiscal year. He said past reports have shown losses every year going back
to 1990 and beyond, including fiscal year 2002 when the home had a
pre-depreciation profit.
The
administrator admits that the current budget was based on 96 percent
occupancy, but says that the occupancy in the previous fiscal year was 94
percent and that he therefore felt comfortable projecting 96 percent.
Although, occupancy for the first seven months of fiscal year 2004 has
been below 96 percent, things are turning around.
“We
are currently at 52 beds, which is 98 percent,” Graham said last Friday.
“Hopefully by the middle of next week, we will be completely full.”
Occupancy
is not something fully within the control of the district, and it is
affected by everything from the economy to acts of God, Graham said.
Whatever the cause, empty beds have a profound impact on the financial
operations of the home when five beds can generate approximately $185,000
per year.
“We,
as a community and as taxpayers, need to support the nursing home and help
keep the beds full by talking it up,” Graham said. “It’s in all our
best interests.”
With
regards to the professional liability insurance, Fletcher says he feels
taxpayers are exposed to a huge risk not having that protection, but
Graham says the risk is limited and that the premium for the insurance
simply went out of control this year.
“Our
premium last year was $18,769 for medical professional liability
coverage,” he said. “For this year we were notified that – with zero
claims against us – the coverage was going up to $136,824. We simply
couldn’t afford it.”
Graham
said Texas tort law caps the amount for which the hospital district can be
liable and also said the district does carry general liability coverage.
The
district’s debt includes a bond in excess of $1.5 million (for
remodeling the Medical Center Nursing Home and adding ten beds to produce
more revenue) and approximately $160,000 in local notes, which were taken
out to build the Community Services Building and Ambulance Building and to
purchase equipment and software for the ambulance service and MCNH.
Fletcher
says the district can’t keep borrowing money for those kinds of
expenses. Graham says that the Community Services Building generates lease
revenue for the district, that building the ambulance facility “just
made sense,” and that the other equipment was needed.
Fletcher,
who is in his first year of a two-year term, says talk around town that he
wants to close the nursing home or fire employees are just rumors started
by other board members.
“I
swore when I took office out there to operate it as I would my own
business,” he said. “My feeling is just that no one wants to change
anything.”
For
his part, Graham said the people of Donley County have to decide what
services they want to do without when it comes to budget cuts. He also
says he’s willing to talk to Fletcher any time to discuss his concerns
but that Fletcher has never done that.
“If
Mr. Fletcher has questions, he has the opportunity to come to my office
any time,” Graham said, “but he has never been to my office to discuss
any issues pro or con, good or bad.”
The
Donley County Hospital Board will meet in regular session next Tuesday,
April 20, at 6 p.m.
|